1 Samuel 8:4-20
Mark 3:20-35
The people of Israel didn’t understand God enough to trust
that they could have only God as king and not need a human king. And when they didn’t understand, they
responded by attacking what they didn’t know, demanding something different, refusing
to listen to the warnings coming their way. The Pharisees assumed that even
though he was actually healing people, Jesus must have been doing this by the
power of Satan. They didn’t understand
how Jesus could successfully have driven out the demons, so they attacked and
accused him of evil, even in the face of the amazing good he was doing. Even Jesus’ family, when they didn’t understand
his behavior, decided he must have been crazy and tried to get him away from
the people.
We do this too.
When we don’t understand another person’s perspective, or what is
happening around us in the community, in our country, in our world, it is so
easy to simply attack that which we don’t understand. If we can vilify the other, then we don’t
ever have to understand it. We can
simply discount it as evil or crazy. How
much harder is it to actually listen to another opinion, to actually pay attention
to what someone else says just for itself without our preconceived ideas. How much easier if we don’t have to look, don’t
have to listen, and don’t have to be open to learn or to grow when we can just
discount the other as evil or crazy or just completely wrong.
We all do this.
No matter where we stand theologically or politically, there are things
all of us don’t understand and therefore refuse to even consider. These may be things that scare us, things
that don’t fit in with our vision or our worldview, things that may challenge
us at our core, things that make life feel that it might not be the safe,
contained, organized world that we know – all of these we may refuse to even
consider. I would like to invite you to take a moment and think about what you
won’t even entertain. What will you not
allow your mind to even consider as possibly true? As possibly accurate? As possibly good?
I want to remind you that as we see in Jesus, that it is
in the unknown, the uncomfortable, that which we would never consider in which
we find God. God shows us this in Jesus,
who was completely other than what the people of God, the religious people of
the time, expected. He healed those
deemed unworthy and rejected by the people.
He cared for those whom others knew it was illegal by law to even
interact with. He appeared crazy and
even evil to the Pharisees, who again were the religiously righteous of the
day, and even to his family. That’s
where God is: God is in the unexpected, the unknown, the unseen. God is in the mystery, those things we don’t
understand: those things that are beyond our understanding and sometimes those
things we refuse to consider. The Israelites were God’s people but they could
not see or accept God as the only king they needed. The Pharisees were the
religious people of the day and yet they who were most faithful to the
synagogue and the religious laws of the time could not see that the healing
Jesus did was by the Spirit. If we think
that we are better than these faithful people, we need to look at ourselves
again. What is it that we block out that
God could be saying to us, speaking to us, calling us to notice, see, love, and
take in as God’s people?
I shared with you before that Scott Peck describes evil in
his book, “People of the Lie.” He has a psychiatric practice, but he is also a
strong Christian who believes in the existence of evil, as well as the power of
love to confront it, overcome it, and change it. As he
worked with people, both the victims of evil and those who perpetrated it, he
came to believe that people who do evil are people who simply cannot accept
truth. They cannot accept the truths of
their own sinfulness and they project it out onto others and then try to
destroy it in others. As he puts it
himself, “it is characteristic of those who are evil to judge others as evil.
Unable to acknowledge their own imperfection, they must explain away their
flaws by blaming others. And if necessary, they will even destroy others in the
name of righteousness.” We see this
happening on a regular basis: televangelists who condemn and criticize a
certain behavior only to be discovered engaging in the very behavior they
condemn. Politicians similarly who push
for certain rules only to be found engaging in the behaviors they are working
so hard to make illegal. We see the truth in this as we learn that
people like Hitler who may have had Jewish blood himself. We see this reflected in our literature, such
as the way Voldermort was trying to kill anyone who was not “pure blood” when
he himself was only half-Wizard.
Dr. Peck also put it this way, “evil is…the imposition
of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion – in order to avoid
spiritual growth.” And also, “(those who
do evil have) a brand of narcissism so total that they seem to lack, in whole
or in part, this capacity for empathy…..This narcissism permits them to ignore
the humanity of their victims as well….There is only one particular kind of
pain they cannot tolerate; the pain of their own conscience, the pain of the
realization of their own sinfulness and imperfection…. They never think of themselves as (doing) evil;
on the other hand, they consequently see much evil in others…evil people are
often destructive because they are attempting to destroy evil. The problem is that they misplace the locus
of the evil. Instead of destroying
others, they should be destroying the sickness within themselves. As life often threatens their self-image of
perfection, they are often busily engaged in hating and destroying that life –
usually in the name of righteousness.
They are unceasingly engaged in the effort to maintain the appearance of
moral purity…. Since the evil, deep
down, feel themselves to be faultless, it is inevitable that when they are in
conflict with the world, they will invariably perceive the conflict as the
world’s fault. Since they must deny
their own badness, they must perceive others as bad. They project their own evil onto the world. They never think of themselves as evil; on
the other hand, they consequently see much evil in others.”
Richard Rohr echoed these ideas in his column, “Jesus:
Forgiving Victim.” He wrote, “Fighters
are looking for the evil, the sinner, the unjust one, the oppressor, the bad
person "over there." He or she "righteously" attacks,
hates, or even kills the wrong-doer, while feeling heroic for doing so (see
John 16:2). Philosopher René Girard sees this tendency to scapegoat others as
the central story line of human history. Why? Because it works, and it is
largely an immediate and an unconscious egoic response… We are all tempted to
project our problems on someone or something else rather than dealing with it
in ourselves. The zealot--and we've all been one at different times--is
actually relieved by having someone to hate, because it takes away his or her
inner shame and anxiety and provides a false sense of innocence. As long as the evil is "over there"
and we can keep our focus on changing or expelling someone else … then we feel
at peace. …Playing the victim is a way to deal with pain indirectly. You blame
someone else, and your pain becomes your personal ticket to power because it
gives you a false sense of moral superiority and having been offended. You
don't have to grow up, you don't have to pray, you don't have to let go, you
don't have to forgive or surrender--you just have to accuse someone else of
being worse than you are. And sadly that becomes your very fragile identity,
which always needs more reinforcement. (Another way to deal with our pain is to)…
refuse s to live in the real world of shadow and contradiction. (Some) divide
the world into total good guys and complete bad guys, a comfortable but untrue
worldview of black and white. This approach comprises most fundamentalist and
early stage religion. It refuses to carry the cross of imperfection, failure,
and sin in itself. It is always others who must be excluded so I can be pure
and holy.… These patterns perpetuate pain and violence rather than bring true
healing.”
Richard Rohr goes on to explain how Jesus is the
opposite of this because he takes our hatred without returning it, nor does it
use it to play the victim. He suffers without making the other suffer..
The thing is that
most evil works from a place of fear. We
fear our own sinfulness. We fear the
other out of a place of not knowing them, refusing to really get to know, understand
or have compassion for the other, for that which is different. But as we know, fear leaves no room for
beauty or grace or anything truly good.
I found myself thinking about the movie, “The Devil
wears Prada”. The movie’s main
character, Andi, starts as a person with goals and integrity. She wants to be a journalist, and she has
written about injustices such as poor work conditions. She is in a committed relationship and values
her time with her friends and family.
Her values do not include high fashion, expensive things, or working to
the exclusion of everything else. She is
down-to-earth, centered, and knows where she is heading and what she
wants. When she first applies for the
job as Assistant to the Director of Runway Magazine, she is appalled by the
value system that surrounds her – the emphasis on accessories that make no real
difference to one’s well-being, the insistence on being thin, on looking
“right,” on dressing “right.” But when
she takes the job, she finds her values and her identity being slowly pushed,
slowly and subtly undermined. She finds
herself giving up more and more of her time with her friends, family and
significant other. She finds herself
being pulled into the drama of fast paced work and eventually into valuing the
clothing and accessories she didn’t used to care about. The choices she is faced with – to choose
depth and relationships, or to choose appearance and achievement are subtle,
but she finds herself choosing for the latter again and again, and she finds
herself saying to those who would challenge those choices, “well, I didn’t have
a choice!” She says that when she hurts her friend by going in her place to
France because the boss asked her to do that.
She says that when she misses her boyfriend’s birthday. She says it when she has no time to spend
with the people who love her. She loses
and gives up more and more, and slips down the slope into being a person who
has thrown out her own deeply held values, all with the phrase, “I didn’t have
a choice.” She didn’t realize that she
was choosing “evil”, even when she did something that devastated another human,
that took away another human’s hopes and dreams. She told herself that she had no choice
because she had to keep her job. But
that lie that she told herself, that the job was the most important thing, that
lie led her more and more into “hell”…she lost her friends, she lost her significant
other, she lost her sense of self and her values. She refused to see the sin in her own
behavior and projected it outwards, harming others. As her boyfriend breaks up with her, she
receives a phone call from her boss, and she says, “I’m sorry. I have to answer this,” STILL not realizing
she is making a choice. She couldn’t see
evil. She couldn’t see she had a
choice. She couldn’t look at herself or
consider the idea that maybe there was a different choice for her to make.
Bonhoeffer put it this way, “Judging others makes us
blind, whereas love is illuminating. By judging others we blind ourselves to
our own evil and to the grace which others are just as entitled to as we are.”
While the talk of evil or evil people may not be
comfortable language for you, I think it is something we have to look at. We attack what we don’t understand. We attack what we are UNWILLING to understand
– sometimes parts of ourselves that we are uncomfortable with, parts of
ourselves that we would deny, parts of ourselves that simply make us
uneasy. But in attacking what we are
unwilling to understand, we refuse to confront the sinfulness or errors or bad
choices in ourselves, to change it, to grow.
We ignore the opportunities to grow more deeply with God. We also injure others, we attack good things,
as the case of Jesus and the Israelites show us, we attack that which is godly,
which is holy, God’s own children who are different from us but whom God still
loves. We attack that which is bringing
life to others of God’s people.
If the Pharisees had been willing to consider that Jesus
was a man of God, their lives would have been changed for the better; they
would have met God, they may have found healing for their own souls. If the Israelites were to have relied on God
alone to be king, they might have learned faith and trust at a much deeper
level, they would not have risked being exploited by their leadership, as
Samuel warned them they would be, they might not have found themselves exiled
over and over again. And if we might be
willing to consider that which we refuse to consider, we might find ourselves
making friends and crossing bridges with those who are different from us, we
might find ourselves called into action that helps those we normally don’t even
see, we might see God’s face in an unexpected stranger, and get to know God at
deeper and fuller levels.
An old Cherokee told his grandson, “My son, there is a
battle between two wolves inside us all.
One is Evil. It is anger,
jealousy, greed, resentment, inferiority, lies and ego. The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, humility,
kindness, empathy and truth.” The boy
thought about it, and asked, “Grandfather, which wolf wins?” The old man quietly replied, “The one you
feed.”
But the good news in this is that there is hope, even
when we don’t want to see, even when we don’t choose well. Because God is a God of love, of healing, and
of hope. And if we turn it all over to
God, to really spend time LISTENING to God, there is hope, there is movement,
there is possibility for us as well.
Love truly can overcome evil or pain or hate or fear. We just have to be open, and let God do God’s
work within us. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment